Ownership

-
The first chapter is all about ownership. By discussing this topic, the author starts with the doctrine of creation. For him, this doctrine separates his approach from all other approaches by other economists. By insisting on the importance of the doctrine of creation to economics, he argues that the universe, man, economic laws, and economic growth are not autonomous.

The doctrine of creation establishes the idea of original ownership, which belongs to God alone as explicitly stated in Psalm 24:1–2 and many other biblical passages. And since it is God who created the world, He is therefore the original and absolute Owner of everything. The idea therefore of ownership is basically theocentric. This tells us that the economic concept of ownership is ultimately a theological idea. The concept of ownership cannot be properly understood apart from God as the ultimate Owner of all things.

Providence is another corollary doctrine that cannot be separated from the doctrine of creation. This doctrine teaches us that God cares and governs His creation in a personal way. As applied to economics, God’s ownership of everything must be understood in relation to His attributes. He sees and knows all things; He has total control of everything; and He is everywhere.

The Creator and Owner of everything revealed Himself in the Bible as the Triune God. Therefore, the system of ownership He requires of man must reflect the doctrine of the Trinity where both unity and diversity are affirmed. For the author, this is the reason “why God sets forth rules of ownership that are at the same time collective (unity) and individualistic (diversity).” He further explains this unity and diversity in ownership of property: “Some pieces of property are owned by individuals. Some are owned by families. Other pieces of property are owned by associations and corporations. Some are owned by churches, and some are owned by the civil government, meaning the state.”

Furthermore, he adds that the Bible teaches “a system of overlapping ownership.” By this, he means that “Certain pieces of property are owned primarily by individuals but only secondarily by the state. In other cases, property is owned by individuals, but families also have rightful claims.” He elaborates this by saying that “property must never be defined as exclusively and absolutely owned by any single human being or any single human institution.” He derives this conclusion from the very idea of God’s absolute ownership of everything. All human ownership are subordinate.

However, this concept of human ownership must be respected for it is God who gave such ownership to man. Ownership is a gift from God. Subordinate ownership is given to man by virtue of God’s delegation making man responsible to take care of the entire creation. Man therefore is a steward of God under His supervision. “This means,” says the author “that man is responsible to God for the proper administration of everything that has been entrusted to him.”

If man fails to fulfill his duties and responsibilities in taking care of creation, there will be negative consequences. In economics, they describe these consequences as losses. Ethics therefore is an inescapable reality in man’s fulfillment of responsibilities entrusted to him by God.

Ethics is another thing that separate a Christian economists from all other economists. Economists “do not believe in an institutional order created by God, governed by His laws, and restrained by economic sanctions.” For them, market’s sanctions are autonomous. But for Christian economists, economic sanctions are still governed by biblical law, not by market law or state law.

Finally, applying such ethical responsibility to a specific generation, the author asserts that each generation has an obligation to increase its capital base to serve as an inheritance for the next generation (Proverbs 13:22a).



Reference: North, Gary. 2017. Christian Economics Volume 1: Student’s Edition. Dallas, Georgia: Point Five Press. Pp. 9-19.

Mga Komento

Mag-post ng isang Komento

Mga sikat na post sa blog na ito

Five Precepts of the Modern Mind

-
While doing my devotion this morning, I stumbled with an interesting section in the book  Thinking. Loving. Doing. A Call to Glorify God with Heart and Mind. I am now on the 2nd chapter. I am reading the article written by R. Albert Mohler Jr., The Way the World Thinks: Meeting the Natural Mind in the Mirror and in the Marketplace. I just want to share that interesting section on pages 61 to 62.   Here is its excerpt: In order to understand better the modern mind, consider these five precepts. First, the modern mind is characterized by postmodern anti-realism. There are people in American society who are not sure that what we are talking about is even real. They argue that the terms of morality—statements about what is right and wrong—are merely a language game. The second precept is moral relativism . Although most of the people we know do not actually hold to anti-realism, it has filtered down into the culture as moral relativism. Most unregenerate Americans today are...
Magbasa nang higit pa

The Special Duties of Husbands to their Wives

-
Fulfill your duties to your wife in order to avoid the following unhappy results: Failure of your wife to fulfill her duties towards you Such will cause you much affliction She will be bitter towards you in the end Summary of your Duties as Christian Husbands: You are responsible to undertake the government of your family including your wife. This ability consists: In holiness and spiritual wisdom. An ungodly, irreligious man is both a stranger and an enemy to the most important part of family-government. In due acquaintance with the works of your calling. He that is utterly unacquainted with the members of his family, will be very unfit to govern them. He must be acquainted both with the common temper and infirmities of mankind, that he may know how much is to be borne with, and also with the particular temper, and faults, and virtues of those whom he is to govern. And he must have prudence to give them direction in accomplishing their tasks; and justice to deal with every one as they...
Magbasa nang higit pa

No One is Above the Law

-
No one is above the law, and that includes even the government. If you see a government violating the moral law, what do you think will happen? Will the Supreme Lawgiver keep silent as His law is being trampled by human governments? One example of such violation is now being done by the government of Australia by moving hard left . The policymakers are either blinded by their ideology or they intentionally take for granted the long-term destructive consequences of such tax policy. They are not aware that by violating God’s law on private property, they are actually committing economic suicide. How many governments in the world are following the same course? May God forbid that the Philippine government will choose the same path! 
Magbasa nang higit pa